why deepstreamHub? compare us getting started feature roadmap faq
use cases pricing
enterprise blog contact

Relational data with deepstreamHub

Relational databases are common in our industry, and quite often developers learn to model their data using relational techniques. Learning how to represent these common patterns in NoSQL solutions is hugely beneficial for both green field projects and enhancements for legacy software.

We're going to take a dive into representing some common relationships using deepstreamHub's Records. These are tiny blobs of JSON that we can subscribe to, update and permission. They are persisted to both a cache and database, making writes quick, reads quicker and updates realtime.

1 - 1 relation

A way to model 1 - 1 data is often not needed in applications and traditional SQL databases. In most cases data can be merged into a single table or document/collection.

However sometimes we end up with a customer table like this:

id firstname lastname info
23 alex harley Like's pizza

And a customer_details table like this:

user_id address card_number dob
23 Berlin xxx-xxx-xxx-xxx 1901

In these situations, it would never make sense for a customer to have multiple sets of customer_details, and it would never make sense for a customer_details row to belong to more than one customer. Here the relationship is strictly 1 - 1.

In terms of usage with deepstreamHub, this could be useful if we don't always want to load a large amount of data for a user each time we fetch them. Or it may make sense to have a separate Record for a user's billing data that we don't need to fetch each time.

The way to model this data is to use a pointer to another Record, inside the original Record. It might look a bit like this:

    firstname: 'Alex',
    lastname: 'Smith',
    detailsRecord: 'details/abc-123'
    address: 'Berlin',
    cardNumber: 'xxx-xxx-xxx-xxx',
    dob: 1901

Now we can get a bit of info about a user at any time:

const record = client.record.getRecord('users/abc-123')
record.whenReady((record) => {
    const { firstname, lastname, detailsRecord } = record.get()

And whenever the user themselves wants to look at their details or update them, it's as simple as:

const detailsRec = client.record.getRecord(detailsRecord)
detailsRec.whenReady((record) => {
    const { address, cardNumber, dob } = record.get()

Another benefit of this is that it makes it super easy to permission different parts of the data set. Let's pretend that whenever we mouse-over a user we want to display their name and a bit of info about them. This way, we only need to fetch the users/abc-123 Record.

However the only person that should be able to look at a users card details is themselves. So we can permission the details Records in a way to enforce this using Valve. The rule to do this might look a bit as follows, all we're doing is enforcing that the only user who can read and write to a details/ record is the user themself.

    read: "user.id === userId"
    write: "user.id === userId"

1 - n relation

Let's stay on track and look into a more involved example with some 1 - n relationships.

In long lived applications, it is quite common to find that users update their addresses for whatever reason. Usually this is fine, however in certain situations (often when payments are involved), we need to keep a history of those addresses. In this case, we have a 1 - n relationship where customers have multiple addresses.

With the relational model, we can end up with a customer table:

id firstname lastname
23 alex harley

And an address table like this:

user_id street_address city post_code country
23 123 Marienstrasse Berlin 88763 Germany
23 64 Engeldamm Berlin 12345 Germany

Where the user_id column has a foreign key constraint on the id column of the customer table.

Modelling this with deepstreamHub is simple, instead of a pointer a Record, this time we just point towards a List.

    firstname: 'Alex',
    lastname: 'Smith',
    addresses: 'abc-123-addresses' // [ 'addresses/789', 'addresses/894 ]

This list abc-123-addresses itself just contains pointers to the actual address Records. One of these may look as follows:

    streetAddress: '123 Marienstrasse',
    city: 'Berlin',
    postCode: '88763',
    country: 'Germany'

When it comes to fetching these addresses (assuming we already have the user Record), we can do this as follows and render them:

const addressList = client.record.getList(addresses)
addressList.whenReady((list) => {

const renderAddress = (recordName) => {
    const record = client.record.getRecord(recordName)
    record.whenReady(record => console.log(record.get()))

// { streetAddress: '123 Marienstrasse', city: 'Berlin', postCode: '88763', country: 'Germany' }
// { streetAddress: '64 Engeldamm', city: 'Berlin', postCode: '12345', country: 'Germany' }

m - n relation

Let's again take a more involved look into these relations and look at many - many relationships. There are a few different ways of doing this with Records, each with their own trade offs. Some are better suited for querying, some less so, but it all depends on the use case at hand.

Consider the social network situation where you have Groups and People, groups may contain many people and each person may belong to many groups. Using the relational model, it might look a bit like the following:

We have a user table:

id firstname lastname
23 alex harley

And a group table like this:

id name about city
78 hiking A place for hikers Berlin
96 gaming Gaming all day Auckland

Then a join table groups_users as follows:

user_id group_id membership_type
23 78 admin
23 96 member

Now let's have a look at doing this with Records.

A list pointer in each Record

Perhaps the most basic way of expressing a many - many relationship, we can simply reference a List in each Record in the dataset, that points to more data.

Here we have group 1234, which has members interested in hiking and was created at 12345435.

    name: "hiking",
    created: 12345435,
    memberList: "members-1234" // [ "users/123", "users/124" ]

One of these users looks like this, and also contains a list of the groups they're a part of:

    firstname: "Alex",
    lastname: "Smith",
    groupList: "groups-xyz" // [ "groups/1234" ]

This way of modelling data is very easy to reason about and makes it simple to query from both sides i.e. all the groups a user belongs to, and all the users in a group.

A downside however is that adding or removing a user from a group can be more complicated. We have to do two writes/deletes, once on the users side and once on the groups side.

An intermediary relationship Record

The above example is great for just expressing a relationship between records, but if we want to have any extra data associated with these we'll need an intermediary Record to store additional metadata about the relationship. In this case, we may want to have a users type of membership in a group.

Let's have a look at how one of these Records would be structured:

    type: "admin",
    joined: 12787434,
    referrals: 8

From here, both groups and user Records will point to lists that contain these.

    firstname: "Alex",
    lastname: "Smith",
    memberships: "memberships-123" // [ memberships/q6756i9 ]
    name: "hiking",
    created: 12345435,
    memberships: "memberships-1234" // [ memberships/q6756i9 ]

The basic idea around fetching data from this type of setup, is that we need to load, a couple of different Lists and Records to get everything we need. Let's quickly cover some example queries we can do with this:

Adding a user to our hiking group

The first thing we need to do is get references to our group and user Records. From here we need to create our new membership record. Under the hood, the getRecord function actually does a CREATE OR READ call, so the syntax for getting and creating Records is the same.

const groupRecord = client.record.getRecord('groups/1234')
const userRecord = client.record.getRecord('users/123')
const mId = `memberships/${client.getUid()}`
const membershipRecord = client.record.getRecord(mId)

Next we need to set the data of our membership Record, for now we only have the type, joined and referrals properties.

    userId: 'users/123',
    groupId: 'groups/1234',
    type: "user", // could be admin, organiser, etc
    joined: Date.now(),
    referrals: 0

Lastly we just need to add this membership Record to the user and group membership Lists. For brevity I'll just show adding the membership to the group, however the code is exactly the same for adding to the user membership list.

const membershipListName = groupRecord.get('memberships')
const groupList = client.record.getList(membershipListName)

And now we have a relationship between two entities in our application. The code for removing a user from a group, would also be very similar.

Getting all members of our hiking group and when they joined

Let's say we wanted to list all members of our hiking group. This is pretty simple and can be accomplished very quickly. First we just need to get a reference to our group Record, and then call our enumerateMembers function with our membership list.

const record = client.record.getRecord('groups/1234')
record.whenReady((record) => {

Our enumerateMembers function simply gets the Record for each of our memberships. It calls both the displayUser function with the users Id and when they joined.

function enumerateMembers(memberList) {
    memberList.forEach((membershipId) => {
        const memberRecord = client.record.getRecord(membership)
        memberRecord.whenReady(record => {
            displayUser(record.get('userId'), record.get('joined'))

Finally our displayUser function just loads the users Record and logs their name and when they joined the hiking group.

function displayUser(userId, joined) {
    const userRecord = client.record.getRecord(userId)
    userRecord.whenReady((record) => {
        console.log(`${record.get('firstname')} has been in the hiking group since ${formatDate(joined)}`)

And just like that, it's pretty easy to query all kinds of different things with this set up. Finding all of a user's groups would be a similar exercise to what we've just done, however I'll leave that up to you.